Pres. Obama Speech
US action in Libya sparks concern among some lawmakers.
Watch President Obama’s speech outlining the United States role in enforcing a United Nations sanctioned “No Fly Zone” over Libya. Also read this article from the Washington Post regarding what role the Congress should have in approving a no fly zone and answer the following questions. You blog must be posted by Friday, March 25, 2011. If you have trouble posting on the Blog site, print off a hard copy or share your response with me in Google Docs.
1. According to President Obama what is the justification for the “No Fly Zone” in Libya and what role will the United States military play in the enforcement.
2. Should the Congress have debated and approved the military action in Libya or is President Obama within his powers as commander-in-chief to authorize the air strikes?
3. Based on the United States current military engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, should the US military get involved in Libya?
Due Tuesday 3/29
36 comments:
Samantha
Period 4
1. According to President Obama it is justified because "We cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy." The United States will enforce and enable the no fly zone using our special capabilities.
2. President Obama is within his powers as commander-in-chief to authorize the air strikes. He is not overstepping his boundaries of power.
3.Based upon the current military engagements of the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq the United States should not get involved any further in Libya. we have our hands full and any further involvement would be too much.
1. The "No Fly Zone" is to protect the people of Libya from the tyrant ruler. Obama doesn't want to sit on the side lines and watch as the tyrant kills his own people. The military is to enable the enforcement of the "No Fly Zone" and to protect the people.
2.President Obama is within his powers to authorize the air strikes but if more is needed than Congress should debate rather the US should enter Libya.
3. The US military should not get involved in Libya due to the fact that many soldiers have served their country very well in Afghanistan and Iraq and we do not need more dying without solving the crisis in our hands now.
Dolores Diorio
Per.6
1. According to President Obama, the justification for the "No Fly Zone" in Libya is that basically we have to help the people and we can't just stand by and watch a dictator tell his people there will be no mercy. The United States military will play a role in the enforcement by enabling the "No Fly Zone" and the military will protect the people and civilians of Libya.
2.President Obama is within his powers as Commander In Chief to authorize the air strikes. Although, I think it would have been a good idea for Obama to discuss this idea with congress briefly before putting this into action to get other peoples points of views and opinions. I think if Obama wants to do more than just a "No Fly Zone", then he should definitely talk with congress about it before just doing the action.
3.Since the United States is already dealing with problems of its own, I don't think we should get very involved in this. I think if it comes to a certain point, then yes, maybe we should get involved-but only if the people of Libya want us too. I don't think the United States should get involved in another war when we're already in a difficult war to begin with. We should handle our own problems first before worrying and getting involved with another situation.
Obama justifies the "No Fly Zone" in Libya because he feels that we cannot ignore the fact that a dictator is killing the people and something must be done to protect the citizens of Libya. The military's role is to enforce the "No Fly Zone" as well as to protect the citizens.
As of right now, Obama has not overstepped his boundaries of power as commander-in-chief. However, if this progresses any further than just air strikes, I feel it is within the country's best interest that Obama discuss with Congress further actions. Also, even though Obama is within his powers, it wouldn't have been a bad idea to run his plans by Congress.
I feel that US heavy involvement should definitely be avoided, but aid should be provided for the Libyan people. Just perhaps not right away. I feel that Libya would be a much simpler objective than Afghanistan, that's for sure. If things start to get really out of hand, I say we provide support.
Hayley Bryden
Period 4
1. Adding U.S. military troops to the "No Fly Zone" in Libya was in an effort to protect the country's civilians. Our military is part of a broad coalition along with other members of the United Nations. This seemed necessary because the government is refusing to acknowledge the cease fire offered to them by the international community. The people of Libya are in a lot of danger.
2. In my opinion the President is doing the right thing. If many innocent people are in danger and America has the opportunity to stop it, we should act to help them. I think it is in the powers of the president to authorize air strikes when situations are as dangerous as this. Having congress debate the issue would have only postponed any helpful actions from the U.S. and put Libya and potentially more countries in danger as well.
3. Although we are currently involved in situations in Afghanistan and Iraq, I think it is right for America to get involved with Libya as well. The president chose to go about this in a very smart way. We will be able to help enforce the "No Fly Zone" without needing to deploy ground troops in the country. This keeps military involvement at a minimal level and will hopefully help solve the problem quickly and efficiently.
1. President Obama said that the justification for the “No Fly Zone” in Libya because he is seeing that some action has to be taken to protect the citizens of Libya, to stop the dictator from killing them. The military’s position is to protect the people of Libya by enforcing the “No Fly Zone”
2. Obama has the power to authorize the air strikes, as commander-in-chief, but if necessary and if needed, then congress should step in to debate to approve.
3. The US military shouldn’t get involved in Libya. As a country, we already have too many problems to add another one. We are already involved in the past many difficult years of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, that it is unnecessary. The military should only become involved if Libya reaches out for help, but until then, at least aid them.
According to President Obama the no flly zone is justified because it is beneficial to the people of Libya. The United States military will enforce this rule to protect the people of Libya.
President Obama is within his powers to authorize the air stikes because it lies under his job as commander-in-chief. But he should also discuss it with congress, especially if he wants to do more involing the military and american soldiers, to get different perspectives.
The American military should not get involved in the struggle in Libya because we already have our young men fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.
According to President Obama the no flly zone is justified because it is beneficial to the people of Libya. The United States military will enforce this rule to protect the people of Libya.
President Obama is within his powers to authorize the air stikes because it lies under his job as commander-in-chief. But he should also discuss it with congress, especially if he wants to do more involing the military and american soldiers, to get different perspectives.
The American military should not get involved in the struggle in Libya because we already have our young men fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.
1. President Obama justifies the "No Fly Zone" and the military action that was employed by the U.S. Military in stating that it is part of an ongoing effort to protect innocent Libyan citizens. He refers to the situation in Libya as a "tyrant" who tells the people that there will be "no mercy."
2. President Obama is completely within his powers to authorize the air strikes, especially in times like these where the president has international backing to take action.
3. The U.S. military should not get involved in Libya to the same extent as in Afghanistan and Iraq. Some involvement is necessary to ensure that innocent people are not being killed under the hands of their government. But at the same time the United States can't be all over the world fighting everyone's battles for them.
1.The President has attempted to appeal to the heart of the nation when attempting to justify his support of the UN “no fly zone” over Libya. Directly citing Quadafi as a dictator and tyrant, he is aiming to paint a picture as if the United Sates has no choice but to step in and help the oppressed Libyan people. It is Obama’s belief that a no fly zone will be one of the most effective means of ending Quadafi’s stubborn opposition to the rioting and protests in Libya, and the backing of other nations in the action is what he believes makes it particularly strong. Rather than acting alone, the UN brings together a alliance of nations from around the world, and this policy works perfectly with Obama’s diplomatic approach to many foreign conflicts. The no fly zone will be carried out by non-US forces, but Obama is pressuring for the US military to donate their superior striking power to cause and aid in air strikes in the region. US submarines and ships have also been employed in launching missiles.
2.I believe that debate in Congress was appropriate for this foreign conflict. At a time when the nation is incredibly war-weary, military involvement in another nation’s struggle will be a contentious topic and most likely opposed by many. Even the Democrats in Congress, are resisting Obama in his calls for US engagement in Libya. President Obama is technically within his role as Commander –in-Chief in declaring emergency action and deploying a small force of US military, but it is not in the best interest of the nation to use those powers at this current time. As President, Obama should listen to the people and amidst such strong opposition. Ultimately he is the leader of the United Sates and he must do what is best for his own nation and honor the system that its citizens revere.
3.Involvement in Libya would be an overextension of the United Sates. The wars being fought in Afghanistan and Iraq have left America with trillions of dollars in debt, and the nation simply cannot afford to donate any more military to another foreign conflict. The people of the United Sates are not in favor of this conflict and the Legislative branch of the government is echoing their appeals. The Afghanistan and Iraq wars may be resented now, but at their start, they were supported by the public. Involvement in another conflict that is hated from its conception would be a serious mistake by the executive branch.
1. According to President Obama what is the justification for the “No Fly Zone” in Libya and what role will the United States military play in the enforcement.
The no fly zone it to protect the Libyan people.
2. Should the Congress have debated and approved the military action in Libya or is President Obama within his powers as commander-in-chief to authorize the air strikes?
I feel he is within his power as commander & chief.
3. Based on the United States current military engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, should the US military get involved in Libya?
I definitely feel that due to our engagements in the war now that we should not put our self's deeper into det. i feel that it would be in the presidents best interest to stay out of Libya.
1. According to President Obama, the United States has the responsibility to protect the innocent people of Libya. Their people have been subjected to cruelty, murder and other brutal, unjustified acts imposed by their own government. Since Gadhafi rejects the signing of a cease-fire, the Americans are forced into action. President Obama states that the U.S. will not actually deploy forces to Libya but a “No Fly Zone” will be enforced.
2. I respects President Obama’s action wholeheartedly. I think it is the right thing for the U.S. to step in because the Libyan government continues to commit brutal acts against its civilians. However, according to the article, it seemed to me that the president did not really get the approval from the Congress. Despite the fact that he is acting in the interest of the Libyans, he should have fully discussed the situation with the Congress before taking any actions.
3. Based on the U.S.’s current military engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US government should have been more prudent with its decision on getting involved in the Libyan crisis.
1. Obama says it is the responsibility of the people of the United States to protect the innocent people of Libya who are being tortured by the regime of their own government. Americans had to act when Gadhafi refused cease fire, already undermining the chances of communication and peace. Obama also claims that America will not be sending over armed forces but rather enforce a “No Fly Zone”.
2. Obama’s decision was within his powers as Commander and Chief, but I honestly cannot say whether or not I agree with the situation. On one hand Libyan civilians seem like they really do need the help protecting themselves against the cruel treatment of their government. On the other America is so tied up in other countries we have not been able to focus on our own country. Also Obama seems like he did not actually get approval, if he had to do these things, it would have been better if he had gotten approval. If anything we should support them without direct involvement, support other countries in fighting for them, and speak out against Gadafi.
3. The U.S. government is engaged all over the world in various conflicts, that we chose to get into that is not only sapping the lives of soldiers, but our money, and has put us in increasing debt. We should have been more careful in getting involved in the Libyan crisis.
Mike Heafy
Period 6
1.) President Obama justifies the "No Fly Zone" in Libya since the ruler of Libya is a tyrant who has openly made it clear that he will not show mercy on his people. Obama will not sit there and do nothing when somebody is attacking his people. Barrack Obama will use military support in Libya, but will not be sending troops.
2.)I believe that it is within the presidents powers to authorize an air strike since he is commander-in-chief, and has the right to move and deploy troops as he so chooses.
3.) Although our military is already engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, I believe that the U.S. military should help out in Libya because their people are being killed, and need help.
Period 6
1.
The United States is playing the role of controlling the engagement in Libya. By this i mean that even though there is a "No Fly Zone" the United States is going to do everything they can to make sure that No Fly Zone helps the rebels of that nation.
2.
I believe Congress should have debated on this action, because no 1 man can make the decision of many people, even if he is getting the opinions of others. It wouldn't be as great of a decision if Congress would have agreed to authorizing the air strikes.
3.
I don't believe that the United States should get involved in Libya because putting troops down in Libya or using other military personnel in something that doesn't concern us would be the right way to go for the United States, i feel we should just wait and see what happens within the coming months/years.
1. Apparently to President Barrack Obama the "No fly zone" is justified to protect the people of Libya from the dictating tyrants killing them. And our role is for our military to use force to help them.
2. I believe Obama was in his authorized powers to authorize the air strikes. Our president shouldn't just do nothing, he needs to show the World that he's serious and can help other countries.
3. I do not think they should get too involved because the U.S. military has been in Iraq and Afghanistan for 10 years and really haven't solved much, so they should settle that problem before they get involved with more foreign issues.
Chris Moruzzi
Period 1
1. President Obama's no fly zone over Libya is justified because the leader of Libya has been mercilessly killing civilians of his own country. The no fly zone is going to be used as protection to the citizens of Libya.
2. President Obama did not exceed his powers as Commander and Chief because he clarified that he has no intention of sending in troops. The use of air support is less binding than military troops because then there would be U.S. occupancy in Libya. Air support can be back in the U.S. in a matter of hours.
3. I do not believe the U.S. should be getting further involved in Libya because of the fighting in Afghanistan. The U.S. needs to stop getting its nose into the affairs of every other country because countries will begin to rely on U.S. intervention. This doesn't mean we must stop helping other countries, but we need to focus our efforts on the matters at hand before we take on another challenge. America's allies can certainly give their support to Libya while the U.S. concentrates on its current issues.
Andrew Cusano period 6
1. President Obama's justification for the no fly zone over Libya is that he is renforcing a UN resolution.
2. Although President Obama has not overstepped his boundaries as Commander in Chief I still think he should have at least notified congress on his intentions. Not letting the people know what your plan is just spells disaster. I know as a resident and Citizen of the United States, I want to be informed as to what our military is doing around the world.
3. As we saw in the political cartoon, the United States cannot afford to get involved in another conflict. With the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan not exactly "up to par", taking on another will only hurt the United States. Also, the conflict in Libya was not that of a direct threat to the United States and her allies. Should the Libyan Military had made a direct threat to the United States, then the use of military force would have been justified. I don't see how you can possibly justify that action in this situation.
Elyssa Eisenberg, P. 6
1. According to President Obama, the no fly zone has been enacted to protect citizens. He says that the US will not deploy any troops on the ground. The US is acting to enforce the United Nation's broad coalition from 1973, to protect the Libyan people. He says that we "cannot stand idly by" when a leader threatens that "there will be no mercy".
2. I think President Obama is within his rights, but that congress should have debated and approved the military action in Libya. I believe this because Libya was not proving an imminent or immediate threat to the United States. We only got involved because of the United Nations, and that, in my opinion, does not make this an exception to discussing this action with congress.
3. I do not think the US military should get involved in Libya. Our efforts need to be focused on establishing a strong central government in Afghanistan so that we can finally pull out. I think that if the US gets too involved with Libya it will take away from continuing our efforts these past years in the war on terrorism.
Period 1.
1. The justification of the “No Fly Zone” was to protect Libyan citizens (according to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973). He also justified it by saying the U.S. cannot just stand by while a tyrant threatens his people. President Obama authorized the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya.
2. Obama is using his power of commander-in-chief correctly and is not over-stepping boundaries. His actions are also not drastic, which is good, and they are wisely thought out. If it was a bigger responsibility, I think he should consult Congress and the Senate.
3. Personally, I don’t think we should get involved with Libya, since we have too much on our plate as it is. Between Iraq and Afghanistan, more and more of our people are at risk, more money is being flushed down the toilet, and most of our actions are not leading to where we wanted them to be. Getting involved in Libya would just be too much for the country, and I doubt they want our help, anyway.
Sam.G period 1
1. I think the "NO FLY ZONE" is only to protect the people of Libya and to show them that there are people that see their situation and care for them and as president Obama said no troop will be on the ground and he is positive that no one will get hurt
2.It's true that every country has to mind it's own business But when a leader of one country sees that people are getting hurt,as a human being he is responsible to protect those people and i think it should be in his power to authorize air strikes
3.I think The Us should not get involved any further because it would be too much for people in military to also fight for another country
Period 1
1. The crisis in Libya is what one might call a humanitarian crisis and one which Obama justfies milartiy action by stating, "We cannont stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy." The no fly zone will be an international effort sponsered and supported by many nations. The United States has not dedicated any troops to this mission, only weapons and other equipment.
2. Considering that this was an international decision and one that involves countries, including the US, the President's thoughts and decision was one many other nation's share. For this particular issue there is no middle ground in my eyes. If he did not take actions people would say America is not playing up to its role as a global superpower, but now that Obama has authorized air strikes people are retaliating saying that he acting too quickly. I believe that debate would have been more preferable for the people of America's consciences, but it would have taken too long to reach any reasonable consensus. Had there been debate the time it would have taken for the debate to last would have been difference between less tyranny and possibility of escalated violence in Libya, more deaths, and a full-blown humanitarian crisis that no one should ever be faced with.
3. Considering that we have already committed billions of dollars to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistanand we are in monumental debt involvment in Libya may not have been the most sensible and economical approach but as a democratic country I believe that the inferred responsibility to protecting and aiding others seeking decmocracies is something we as a nation should contribute to because democracy has proven to be a more logical and practical approach to governing in many countries and it something the people of Libya are crying and dying for. Currently because of the military action Gaddafi is using the coaltion forces against his regime have little choice but to use military force against military force. Gaddafi and his government have ignored all diplomatic talk and negotiation so brutal force seems to be the last way to send the message across to him: Your people don't want you, so leave or we will make you.
Zach
Period 2
1. "We cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy." That is the justification for the "No Fly Zone." The U.S. is trying to prevent further influences by the tyrant especially when many people are being killed.
2. President Obama is within his powers as commander-in-chief to authorize the air strikes. Congress couldn't have done more than advise the President not to because the President uses his power for what he deems necessary.
3. I don't think the our military should get involved in another conflict because we are already in two countries in that general area of the world and we need as many troops as we can to be where the fight that matters to us.
1. The justification is to protect the Libyan civilians from the brutality of Gaddafi's armed forces. Gaddafi was offered a cease fire, an alternative that would make any military action unnecessary, yet the offer, as Obama stated, was ignored. The U.S. has issued a "No Fly Zone" over Libya, meaning that any of Gaddafi's military will be monitored for and shot down. The U.S. has made it clear, however, that no ground troops will be deployed on Libya's soil.
2. No, because the majority of Congress was calling for this action in the first place, and it was an immediate decision to be made. Congress would have taken weeks to debate out the decision, and the president has the authority to may these immediate military actions.
3. Yes, because it is not only the U.S. that is promising for the Libyan people, but all of our allies in Europe and the Middle East. This is not a personal concern for the U.S., nor a conflict against forces who are out to harm the American people. This is a humanitarian issue that the U.S. should be a part of to save the lives of innocent men, women, and children from a ruthless leader.
Mike Coombs
Period 1
1. The justification is to protect the Libyan civilians from the brutality of Gaddafi's armed forces. Gaddafi was offered a cease fire, an alternative that would make any military action unnecessary, yet the offer, as Obama stated, was ignored. The U.S. has issued a "No Fly Zone" over Libya, meaning that any of Gaddafi's military will be monitored for and shot down. The U.S. has made it clear, however, that no ground troops will be deployed on Libya's soil.
2. No, because the majority of Congress was calling for this action in the first place, and it was an immediate decision to be made. Congress would have taken weeks to debate out the decision, and the president has the authority to may these immediate military actions.
3. Yes, because it is not only the U.S. that is promising for the Libyan people, but all of our allies in Europe and the Middle East. This is not a personal concern for the U.S., nor a conflict against forces who are out to harm the American people. This is a humanitarian issue that the U.S. should be a part of to save the lives of innocent men, women, and children from a ruthless leader.
Rachel Seggerman, Per.6
1. President Obama justifies adding US troops to the "No Fly Zone" by calling it an international effort to support the civilians of Libya. The president is following the UN's coalition to enforce the protection of Libyan people from the current hardships they are enduring because of their cruel tyrant, who shows the people of his country no mercy.
2. President Obama is in his powers as commander-in-chief to authorize the air strikes. It was right for him to act to help the people of Libya who are being oppressed. They need all the help they can get. However, he should have consulted congress more before the action just to acknowledge them and keep the country in tune with his decisions.
3. I believe the US would be taking on more than they can handle if they get too involved in Libya. Our involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq should be resolved before we start something new. The only way to finish what we started to to be fully focused on one issue, then once it is taken care of, move onto a new one. What's going on in Libya is tragic, but we can not do our best to help until we finish what we've already started in other places.
Josh Squire Period 1
1. Obama wanted to protect the civilians of Libya so he added the U.S. troops to the No Fly Zone in Libya. Obama wants the military to protect the people of Libya from their tyrant dictator.
2. Though it does not seem like Obama got the full approval from Congress, I respect the fact that as Commander in Chief, he made an executive decision as to what he though the right thing to do was. In this case he is saving innocent people.
3. I'm all about becoming more isolationist. Although America has technically become the world police, we need to think of OUR citizens and if it would be good for our country to get wrapped up in another battle.
1) President Obama is justified because the Libyan government is killing its own people. The United States cannot stand by and watch them kill innocent people.
2) Obama has the power to do this because he consulted many people from different parties and has the backing of other countries.
3) Although it isn't right that the Libyan government is killing its own people, it isn't our job to take care of the entire world. We are already involved in many other countries and we dont have the time or resources to spend on another countries problems.
Ashley Splain
Period 6
1.) According to President Obama the purpose of the "No Fly Zone" is to protect the innocent people of Libya. It is to ensure their safety from the tyranical government that will try to seek revenge and thwart the people's efforts of rebellion using air force planes as a form of military action.
2.) The President did not consult with the Congress much on this decision. And though I may not necessarily agree with this fact as commander-in-chief of the armed forces he is within his consitutional rights to call up military planes and vessals as he so chooses.
3.) I personally believe that it was right to enforce the "No Fly Zone" over Libya because I do think that the people do need help in thier rebellion. But I think that this is where our involvment should end considering that we are involved in enough oversees conflicts. Also this is the people's revolt and we do not know what kind of country they want to build and should thus not try to put our ideals on them or play a part in creating a government that may not be much better than the previous one.
According to Obama, the justification of the "No-fly zone" is to protect the people of Libya from a ruthless ruler is killings his own people. Obama wants to take action and will enforce the "No-Fly Zone" to protect these civilians.
I believe that Obama is well within his powers to authorize the air strikes; although, I feel that if he sat down and discussed this topic with the Congress, great ideas would rise and these all could be implicated into a large plan to create better results.
Based upon the current military engagements of the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq the United States should not get involved any further in Libya. We are already involved in two conflicts, both of which have resulted in no resolution and blatant killing. Involving ourselves in this conflict would just lower our nation's population and get us nowhere while simultaneously hurting our economy because of artillery production.
Mike Giannamore
Period 6
1.) President Obama justified his no fly zone in Libya by saying that we don't support "tyrants." The US Military will enforce the no fly zone but no ground troops will be deployed.
2.) Ideally, congress should have debated whether or not to use military action in Libya, but Obama did not overstep his bounds because, the constitution allows the Commander in Chief to choose where soldiers are stationed.
3.) The US should get involved in Libya, but only to the extent that we already are. I feel that we are citizens of the world before the nation and that we need to help the oppressed people of Libya.
1. According to Obama, the United States is a leader in the world and therefore has a responsibility to protect the innocent citizens of Libya and prevent mass slaughterings. The no-fly zone will ensure that the skies are kept free of Gaddafi's military. Obama also ensures that there will be no troops on the ground
2. Yes, i do think Congress should have debated and ultimately voted on what the right course of action is in Libya. A simple majority in the house would be needed to enforce the no fly zone. I feel that more than just one person should be making a decision of such magnitude.
3. Even though we already have military engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq, I still feel it was the right move to get involved in Libya. After all, our involved is minimal and we are working with many other allies on this. As a world leader, we have the responsibility to protect innocent humans from the atrocities they are facing.
President Obama's justification isthat we just can't sit and watch. It is also to protect the people of Libia from there ruler.
President Obama is with in his powers he is legally allowed to start the air strike.
The American military should by get involved in Libians problems. The military already has enough problems which they are helping other countries with and taking on another would be too much.
Nick Kopjanski Period 4
1.Obama's justification for the "No Fly Zone" is that he does not like when a tyrant tells his citizens that there will be no mercy for them. As for the military play for the United States they will stick to the No Fly Zone and deploy ground troops in Libya.
2. Due to the fact that President Obama is Commander and Chief. He did have the authorization to initiate the air strike. But he also should of informed congress on his decision.
3. Based on our current military situations in Iraq and Afghanistan. I believe that we should not get involved in the current situation in Libya. My reason for this is because we already have not finished two wars that we started so we showed not get involved in another.
1. President Obama says that it is justified because the United States is working with the U.N. The "no fly zone" is stating that President Obama is not going to send in any troops at all. He is trying to over throw a dictator.
3. I don't believe that The US should send in troops to Libya because we have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are spread too thin and it is costing us way to much money.
Post a Comment